Skip to content
RFJ

Section VI · The Scholarly Record

Where the scholars actually agree.

59 scholars and collective bodies, six core questions, fourteen centuries. The most-cited dissenting voices examined honestly. The conclusion made unavoidable: across every madhab, every era, and every collective fatwa body — the conventional mortgage has almost no scholarly support.

See the six questions

The five-second answer

Of 22 scholars and collective bodies surveyed on whether a conventional mortgage is permissible by necessity — 77% say no without qualification, and 23% permit only under conditions almost no Western borrower actually meets. Zero permit it as ordinarily practiced.

Last reviewed2 June 2026Next review due2 September 2026Corrections log

The six questions

Where they agree. Where they disagree.

Each bar shows the proportion of 59 scholars and bodies who prohibit (green), permit only under strict conditions (amber), or permit ordinarily (red).

Q1Universal consensus

Is riba prohibited in Islam?

100%
prohibit

The foundational question. Across fourteen centuries, four Sunni madhabs, the Shīʿah schools, and every recognized contemporary body — is consuming, paying, recording, or witnessing riba forbidden?

59 prohibitn = 59

Real caseA Muslim who knowingly takes an interest-bearing loan from any source.

Q2Overwhelming consensus

Is conventional bank interest the same as Qurʾānic riba?

95%
prohibit

The most contested question of the 20th century. The Egyptian Grand Mufti's 2002 minority opinion famously suggested modern bank interest is not the riba al-Qurʾān forbade — a position rejected by the overwhelming majority of contemporary scholars.

37 prohibit1 permit conditionally1 permitn = 39

Real caseInterest paid on an Australian commercial bank mortgage or earned on a term deposit.

Q3Overwhelming consensus

Is a conventional mortgage permissible by necessity (ḍarūrah) in the West?

77%
prohibit

The question Australian Muslims actually face. The ECFR's 1999 fatwa famously permitted under strict conditions; the majority of contemporary scholars — including Mufti Taqi Usmani, AMJA, the OIC Fiqh Academy — have rejected the application.

17 prohibit5 permit conditionallyn = 22

Real caseAn Australian Muslim with no inherited wealth seeking to buy a Sydney home via a Commonwealth Bank mortgage.

Q4Overwhelming consensus

Is contemporary Murābaḥah-based home finance permissible?

25%
prohibit

Mufti Taqi himself conceived Murābaḥah as a transitional product and has critiqued its modern implementation. Scholars split on whether AU/UK Murābaḥah mortgages preserve the contract's substance or are ḥiyal.

2 prohibit6 permit conditionallyn = 8

Real caseMCCA Australia's Murābaḥah home finance product.

Q5Overwhelming consensus

Is Ijārah Muntahiyah bi-Tamlīk (lease-to-own) permissible?

0%
prohibit

The structurally cleaner alternative — broadly accepted in principle across madhabs and contemporary bodies, with implementation-specific concerns about risk transfer and termination clauses.

0 prohibit3 permit conditionallyn = 3

Real caseAmanah Islamic Finance Australia's IMBT home finance product.

Q6Overwhelming consensus

Is hijrah from a riba-bound society obligatory?

0%
prohibit

Classical scholars permitted living among non-Muslims provided the dīn could be practiced. Contemporary scholars differ on whether structural compulsion to riba meets the threshold for obligatory hijrah.

0 prohibit1 permit conditionallyn = 1

Real caseAn Australian Muslim whose only path to home ownership requires a conventional mortgage.

All views under one roof

Every scholar, every question, one grid.

Filter by era, school, or verdict — then tap any cell to read that scholar’s exact position and its source. Nothing here is summarised away; every cell traces back to a documented statement.

Filter the record

59 of 59
Era
School
Verdict
ProhibitsPermits — strict conditionsPermitsSilent / not documented
Scholar / bodyQ1Riba forbidden?Q2Bank = riba?Q3Mortgage by ḍarūrah?Q4Modern Murābaḥah?Q5Ijārah lease-to-own?Q6Hijrah obligatory?
Abū ḤanīfahHanafi · Classical
Imam Mālik b. AnasMaliki · Classical
Imam al-ShāfiʿīShafii · Classical
Imam Aḥmad b. ḤanbalHanbali · Classical
Ibn Qudāmah al-MaqdisīHanbali · Classical
Ibn Rushd (Averroes)Maliki · Classical
Ibn TaymiyyahHanbali · Classical
Muhammad Rashīd RiḍāReformist · Reformist
Mahmud ShaltūtReformist · 20th c.
Abū al-Aʿlā MawdūdīHanafi · 20th c.
Sayyid QuṭbReformist · 20th c.
Yūsuf al-QaraḍāwīComparative · Contemporary
Mufti Muḥammad Taqī ʿUsmānīHanafi · Contemporary
Wahbah al-ZuhaylīShafii · Contemporary
Monzer KahfComparative · Contemporary
M. Nejatullah SiddiqiComparative · Contemporary
Joe BradfordComparative · Contemporary
Yasir QadhiSalafi · Contemporary
Hatem al-HajHanbali · Contemporary
Salmān al-ʿAwdahSalafi · Contemporary
ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz Ibn BāzSalafi · 20th c.
Muḥammad Ṣāliḥ al-MunajjidSalafi · Contemporary
Mufti Ismail MenkHanafi · Contemporary
Nouman Ali KhanComparative · Contemporary
Omar SuleimanComparative · Contemporary
Sheikh Assim al-HakeemSalafi · Contemporary
Javed Ahmad GhamidiReformist · Contemporary
Muḥammad Sayyid Ṭanṭāwī (Al-Azhar 2002)Reformist · Contemporary
OIC International Islamic Fiqh AcademyBody · Contemporary
AMJA — Assembly of Muslim Jurists of AmericaBody · Contemporary
European Council for Fatwa and ResearchBody · Contemporary
AAOIFIBody · Contemporary
Dār al-ʿUlūm DeobandHanafi · Contemporary
ANIC — Australian National Imams CouncilBody · Contemporary
Abū Bakr al-JaṣṣāṣHanafi · Classical
Al-SarakhsīHanafi · Classical
Abū Ḥāmid al-GhazālīShafii · Classical
Al-QurṭubīMaliki · Classical
Imām al-NawawīShafii · Classical
Ibn ʿĀbidīnHanafi · Classical
Muḥammad Bāqir al-ṢadrComparative · 20th c.
Muhammad HamidullahComparative · 20th c.
Yusuf Talal DeLorenzoComparative · Contemporary
Mohamed Ali ElgariComparative · Contemporary
Sami Al-SuwailemComparative · Contemporary
Mufti Muhammad Rafi UsmaniHanafi · Contemporary
Mufti Ebrahim DesaiHanafi · Contemporary
Mufti Faraz AdamHanafi · Contemporary
Shaykh Akram NadwiComparative · Contemporary
Shaykh Hamza YusufMaliki · Contemporary
Abdal Hakim Murad (T. J. Winter)Comparative · Contemporary
Mufti Abdur-Rahman ibn Yusuf MangeraHanafi · Contemporary
Dr Main Khalid Al-QudahComparative · Contemporary
Islamic Fiqh Council — Muslim World League (Makkah)Body · Contemporary
Saudi Permanent Committee (al-Lajnah al-Dāʾimah)Body · Contemporary
DSN-MUI (Indonesian Ulema Council)Body · Contemporary
Dār al-ʿUlūm KarachiHanafi · Contemporary
Fiqh Council of North America (FCNA)Body · Contemporary
Sharīʿah Advisory Council — Bank Negara MalaysiaBody · Contemporary

The voices that anchor this notebook

Featured scholars.

Closest spiritual reference

Spotlight

Nouman Ali Khan

Founder, Bayyinah Institute · Tafsīr & Qurʾānic exposition · USA

The most-listened-to English-language tafsīr voice on al-Baqarah 2:275–281 — the surah's riba sequence. NAK reads the āyāt as the Qurʾān's most rhetorically severe passage, refuses every necessity-based softening, and frames the modern Muslim's appeal to ḥājah as a negotiation with God about terms God has already closed.

“When God says ‘fear Me and leave what remains of riba’ — and we say ‘but the mortgage’ — we are not asking a fiqh question. We are negotiating. And the surrounding āyāt make clear that there is nothing to negotiate.”

— Tafsīr of al-Baqarah 2:278–279 · Bayyinah

Featured · Contemporary

Mufti Muḥammad Taqī ʿUsmānī

مُحَمَّد تَقِي العُثْمَانِي

Chair, AAOIFI Shariah Board · Vice President, Dār al-ʿUlūm Karachi · 1943–present · Pakistan

The single most consequential living scholar on Islamic finance. His Supreme Court of Pakistan judgment (1999) is the definitive contemporary document on the equivalence of modern bank interest to Qurʾānic riba. Conceived modern Murābaḥah as a *transitional* instrument and has been its most rigorous critic when implementations engineer ownership risk down to zero.

Featured · Contemporary

Joe Bradford

US scholar · specialist in Western Islamic finance · USA

The most directly relevant English-language voice on Western Muslim finance. Trained in classical fiqh; writes specifically about Western product structures. His central thesis: most Western 'Islamic' mortgages calibrated to interest-rate benchmarks are conventional loans in Arabic clothing.

Featured · Contemporary

Yūsuf al-Qaraḍāwī

يُوسُف القَرَضَاوِي

Founding chair, European Council for Fatwa and Research · 1926–2022 · Egypt/Qatar

The most authoritative voice behind the famous ECFR 1999 fatwa permitting Western Muslims to use conventional mortgages for primary residence under strict ḥājah conditions. Critically: he affirmed riba's prohibition absolutely, and qualified the mortgage permission with conditions almost no contemporary borrower actually meets. Subsequently critiqued by AMJA, OIC IIFA, Mufti Taqi, and the majority of contemporary scholars.

Featured · Contemporary

European Council for Fatwa and Research

Collective fatwa body for Muslims in Europe · Europe

The collective body whose 1999 Dublin Resolution 2/4 is the most-cited basis for the permissive mortgage position. Critical reading: the resolution itself listed conditions — no halal alternative, primary residence only, exhausted alternatives — that contemporary AU borrowers rarely meet, and the conclusion has been subsequently rejected by AMJA and the OIC IIFA.

Featured · Contemporary

Javed Ahmad Ghamidi

جاويد احمد غامدي

Pakistani modernist scholar · founder, al-Mawrid Institute · 1951–present · Pakistan/USA

The most-cited dissenting voice among Pakistani-diaspora and Western Muslims. Argues that the riba al-Qurʾān forbade was specifically interest on consumption loans in the historical Arabian context — and contends some modern commercial bank interest falls outside that scope. Critical context: this position has been explicitly rejected by Mufti Taqi, Mawdūdī's institutional inheritors, the OIC IIFA, AMJA, and the overwhelming majority of contemporary scholars across madhabs as historically and exegetically untenable. Western Muslims invoke Ghamidi often; the page treats his position seriously and shows why the majority position differs.

Featured · Contemporary

Muḥammad Sayyid Ṭanṭāwī (Al-Azhar 2002)

Grand Mufti of Egypt; later Shaykh of al-Azhar · 1928–2010 · Egypt

The other famous outlier. The Al-Azhar Islamic Research Council fatwa of 2002 concluded that fixed bank-interest contracts based on mutual consent are not the riba forbidden by the Qurʾān. The opinion provoked an immediate scholarly response and was rejected by the OIC IIFA, AMJA, Mufti Taqi, and the broader Sunni consensus. Cited here as a position that exists in the historical record — and is not a basis for action.

The most-quoted dissent

Why Ghamidi’s view doesn’t hold.

Examined in detail · The Ghamidi position

The position

“Modern bank interest is not Qurʾānic riba.”

Javed Ahmad Ghamidi argues that the riba prohibited in the Qurʾān refers specifically to interest on personal consumption loans in the historical Arabian context — where a wealthy lender exploited a borrower in distress. Modern commercial bank interest, he contends, is a different economic phenomenon: both parties consent, both benefit, neither is in the asymmetric distress of a 7th-century debt slave.

On this framework, a mortgage from CBA or NAB is not a riba transaction in the Qurʾānic sense. It is a permissible commercial arrangement.

Source: Mīzān, vol. on Iqtiṣādī Sharīʿat; numerous Pakistan/USA lectures.

The overwhelming majority response

The distinction collapses on examination.

Three lines of critique have been made by Mufti Taqi Usmani, Mawdūdī’s institutional inheritors, the OIC IIFA, AMJA, and the broad mainstream of contemporary scholars across every madhab:

  1. Historical: Pre-Islamic Arabia had commercial riba as well as consumption riba. The Qurʾān’s prohibition encompasses both — al-Baqarah 2:275 does not distinguish a category of interest the borrower happens to consent to.
  2. Exegetical: The āyah “God has permitted trade and forbidden riba” (2:275) is given precisely as a response to those who said “trade is just like riba” — i.e. those who argued that consensual commercial transactions removed the prohibition. The Qurʾān answers them by name.
  3. Pragmatic: If consent and mutual benefit could remove the prohibition, almost no riba transaction in modern economic life would qualify as forbidden, which would render the prohibition functionally null. No classical scholar held this position; no major contemporary body holds it now.

Cited critiques: Mufti Taqi Usmani, Historic Judgment on Interest, 1999; AMJA Resolutions; OIC IIFA Resolution 10 (2/2), 1985.

Why this section exists. Ghamidi’s name is invoked frequently in Pakistani-diaspora and Western Muslim conversations about mortgages. This page treats his position seriously rather than ignoring it — and then shows, with sources, why the overwhelming majority of contemporary scholars across Sunnī and Shīʿah traditions consider the distinction untenable. The believer who proceeds on Ghamidi’s framework is proceeding on a position that — at the time of writing — no major collective body, no major madhab, and no significant cluster of contemporary scholars endorses.

The complete record

All 59 voices, by era.

Hover or tap any card to read the scholar’s position summary. The colored dot marks the era — gold for classical, amber for reformist, lighter green for 20th century, deep green for living scholars.

Classical13

Reformist1

20th c.6

Contemporary31

The verdict this page lands on

Across madhabs, across centuries, across the contemporary collective fatwa bodies — the conventional mortgage, as ordinarily practiced, has almost no scholarly support.

The 5–15% who permit a Western mortgage do so under conditions — no halal alternative reasonably available, primary residence only, exhausted alternatives — that the Western Muslim today, with real halal-finance providers operating, rarely meets.

The remaining question is not whether the mortgage is permissible — that is settled by the record above. The remaining question is which of the four honest options the believer is willing to take.

Ask