Skip to content
RFJ
§Trust

How this is funded.

The Islamic Finance Guru playbook says transparency about money is the first trust signal a Muslim finance site can give. Here is exactly how this site is funded, what it does NOT take money from, and where the conflicts could be.

You're reading a site that audits Islamic finance providers and recommends specific platforms. That position creates real conflicts of interest unless I'm explicit about them. This page is the explicit version.

What this site does NOT take money from

In categorical terms, with no exceptions at the time of writing:

What this site does (or will) take money from

In honest terms:

  1. Optional reader donations. The Quiet Letter is free. If a reader values the work enough to support it, an optional one-time or monthly donation is the first revenue channel. There is no paywall behind any content.

  2. Future paid courses or community. Possibly. If demand exists for a structured 30-day course, a private Discord, or live monthly scholar Q&A, those will be priced separately and clearly. They will not gate the content that exists today.

  3. Optional 1:1 advisory referrals to vetted licensed Australian Muslim financial advisors. If a reader wants a referral, I will introduce them. If the advisor pays a referral fee, that will be disclosed on the referral page itself.

The above three are the entire potential revenue surface at the time of writing. If any new revenue stream is added, this page will be updated within the same week.

Where the conflicts of interest actually are

Not where you might assume.

The deepest conflict is selection bias: I cover what I know. The Audit covers six Australian providers — there are probably four or five smaller ones (community co-operatives, white-label products) that exist and are not covered yet. Their absence is not an endorsement of absence; it is a coverage gap. Email me their names if you know them.

The second conflict is methodology bias: the Six Pillars rubric is mine, drawn from AAOIFI standards plus the contemporary scholars I most trust. A reader who follows a different methodological school (e.g., a strict Salafī methodology, or a strict Hanafī fiqh) may weight the pillars differently. The rubric is documented openly so this disagreement can be discussed, not hidden.

The third conflict is regional bias: this site is built by an Australian Muslim for Australian Muslims first. UK, US, and EU material is referenced but not audited at the same depth. If someone wants to extend the audit to those markets, I will collaborate. Currently the AU audit is the priority.

What "free" means in practice

It means I am bearing the costs personally. Domain, hosting (Vercel), Anthropic API for the /ask tool, the time. The total monthly cost at launch is roughly AUD $30–60. I'm comfortable bearing this indefinitely if no donations arrive — the work matters enough to me. But the question of sustainability is real, and at some point the donate button will get more prominent. When that happens it will be obvious; nothing will be hidden.

What you can do

If you find value in this work and want to support it without paying:

  1. Share specific pages with people the content might help.
  2. Tell me what's missing — every gap report is more valuable than money.
  3. Send your story for Stories — documented patterns beget more documented patterns.
  4. Forward the Quiet Letter to your local imam or community if it speaks to your context.

If you want to support financially: a donate page is coming soon. For now, the absence of one is itself a signal — the work isn't yet at the scale where money makes the most difference. The audience is.

Back to home

Ask