European Council for Fatwa and Research
Collective fatwa body for Muslims in Europe
The collective body whose 1999 Dublin Resolution 2/4 is the most-cited basis for the permissive mortgage position. Critical reading: the resolution itself listed conditions — no halal alternative, primary residence only, exhausted alternatives — that contemporary AU borrowers rarely meet, and the conclusion has been subsequently rejected by AMJA and the OIC IIFA.
On the core questions
3 of the 6 core questions are documented for this voice. Each carries its source.
Q1 · Is riba prohibited in Islam?
ProhibitsSource:ECFR Resolutions
Q2 · Is conventional bank interest the same as Qurʾānic riba?
ProhibitsSource:ECFR Resolutions
Q3 · Is a conventional mortgage permissible by necessity (ḍarūrah) in the West?
Permits — strict conditionsPermitted Western Muslims to use conventional mortgages for primary residence under strict ḥājah conditions when no halal alternative exists. The most cited contemporary basis for the permissive position. Subsequently critiqued by AMJA, OIC IIFA, Mufti Taqi Usmani, and the majority of contemporary scholars.
Source:ECFR Fatwa, Dublin Session, Resolution 2/4· 1999
Positions are summarised conservatively from documented statements. A label reflects the scholar's strongest documented position; the nuance line captures the qualifiers. Verify against the cited source, and see the methodology for how these were formed.